|
|
|

IssueAlert Emerging Technologies ~ August,
2004
Overcoming Conflicts Between
Business and Information Technology
By Curtis Tarr, Manager & Senior Consultant, TMG
Consulting, Inc.
Today, the requirements for your Customer Information System (CIS)
change quicker than ever before. New competitors are always on the
horizon forcing you to: 1) increase efficiencies in customer service,
or 2) roll-out new products and services to remain competitive.
Frequent regulatory and auditing changes may require you to capture
information or add new operational processes not available within
your current CIS. Changes to internal strategic objectives may require
enhancements to the CIS environment. Whatever the catalyst, your
CIS functionality and operations are constantly being evaluated
and altered. But who within your organization is responsible for
the change? Who initiates the change? And most importantly, who
makes the final decision and approves the change?
In the challenge to react to the ever-changing business requirements,
there exists a constant struggle between Line of Businesses (LOBs)
and Information Technology (IT) entities within a company. Though
the LOBs are ultimately responsible for bottom-line profits and
customer satisfaction, often the IT organization is the entity that
is handed the responsibility of identifying, initiating and implementing
operational changes in response to the changing business environment.
When the IT organization is the driver, there exist inherent conflicts
within the organization. This article will briefly discuss these
conflicts and emphasize the need for the business to be the key
driver and decision maker for any changes or investments, whether
technical or process oriented.
To understand this conflict, consider the differences in the goals,
responsibilities and priorities of the IT organization and the LOBs.
First, to justify the IT organization, the user community must perceive
that IT brings value to the company. This is not an easy task. Many
business executives are not comfortable allocating a dollar value
to technology-based business initiatives which may (or may not)
result in increased revenues, reduced business risk, reduced time-to-market
or reduced costs. Other benefits are purely intangible (limiting
the ability to allocate a dollar value to these benefits). Examples
of intangibles include high customer satisfaction, reduced customer
turn-over and cost avoidance issues (e.g. litigation costs or regulatory
penalties). The IT group is essentially running their own business
as a service organization and must sell their services and justify
their existence.
IT Organizations
Information Technology is a service organization and is the enabler
of the operational processes that support the business. Without
this service, the company is rendered ineffective and unable to
meet customer and market demands. As business competitors continue
to accelerate delivery of new products and services, and as market
rules rapidly change, IT organizations find it difficult to quickly
deliver changes to satisfy business users in a timely manner. As
a result, IT groups today tend to maintain a tight control of business
operations, assuming ownership and responsibility of any changes
to the operational environment. This role goes beyond their role
as an enabler and can hinder the ability of an LOB to react to changes
in the market.
Information Technology organizations that function as the key drivers
of operations (as opposed to just supporting them) become high risk
and high cost to the business. This is one reason that Business
Process Outsourcing (BPO) has become an attractive alternative for
businesses. A BPO arrangement allows the organization to concentrate
on core business processes while relying on external technology
experts to keep an updated technical environment, execute operations
tasks and retain highly-skilled personnel. If you are considering
a BPO arrangement ensure the vendor knows you business very well
and that you establish detailed Service Level Agreements (SLAs).
The BPO contract must be well written with penalties against the
vendor in the event SLAs are missed. This requires close vendor
management to ensure performance metrics are achieved. Realistically,
you should be measuring the performance of your internal IT service
provider in a similar manner. However, monetary penalties against
an internal service provider are usually not an option. Whether
IT services are provided internal or external to your company, the
LOBs must be the key drivers of operational changes.
The IT organization provides significant business knowledge as
well as technical expertise. Due to their role in supporting operational
activities, the IT organization becomes the expert in business functionality.
This is an expected bi-product of IT's responsibilities, including:
- Development and/or maintenance of the applications which support
the business.
- Executes all backend processing.
- Maintains the technical infrastructure.
- Understands the underlying data models.
- Understands the integration points between disparate systems.
This is why IT can quickly assess the need for additional functionality
and/or improvements to current operations. This is also the reason
IT often recommends system changes without LOB involvement or approval.
However, the IT organization must remain the enabler and service
provider only. The LOBs must assume ownership of business functionality
and operational processing.
Barriers Between IT & LOBs
Another inherent barrier between IT and LOBs, result from traditional
corporate planning and budget cycles. These annual cycles define
strategies and establish business performance metrics. However,
the LOB may require a business process change within 60 days to
react to changes in market conditions or increased competition.
The IT organization may be unable to deliver changes in services
due to a constrained budget established the year prior, nor able
to meet a 60 day delivery schedule (requirements analysis alone
may exceed a 60-day window). This conflict must be addressed to
ensure goals can be achieved.
Overcoming the Challenges
How do you overcome the challenges presented by conflicting goals
and objectives between IT and LOBs? The most significant step is
to establish a strong relationship between the client (LOB) and
the service provider (IT). Communication barriers must be broken.
Establish communication forums to discuss and resolve current issues.
Most companies rely on a Change Control Process to track system
issues. This process facilitates the flow of system change requests
from initialization to completion. This process is often perceived
as a black-hole by the user community, which results in little or
no action. However, if managed effectively, the Change Control Process
is the best tool for the LOBs to monitor the performance of the
IT service provider and to ensure that critical issues receive appropriate
attention and accountability for resolution.
A strong partnership must exist between IT and the LOBs. The IT
organization must be an integral part of business planning and share
accountability for corporate financial performance (not just the
LOBs). LOBs must take an active role in managing and monitoring
operational activities. They must understand how the systems interrelate
and how system changes impact their business. LOBs must assume ownership
of projects requesting change to business operations. Remember,
IT is only the enabler, providing a service to the business. Though
IT is responsible for delivering the system changes, they should
not be the "owner" of the initiative. Of course, this
is not achievable without a strong relationship between IT and the
LOBs.
In Summary
the LOBs have the final responsibility of a successful CIS implementation,
enhancement project and daily operations. The end result must support
business processes to ensure your corporate goals are achieved including
sales targets, revenue growth, customer satisfaction and regulatory
compliance. The project should not be driven by the IT organization.
IT is only an enabler of the system. If the project is given to
the IT group, the resulting solution may consist of the latest technology
and fastest processing environment, yet contain functional gaps
that may paralyze your business operations or significantly reduce
your ability to react to market changes.
Curtis Tarr is a Manager and Senior Consultant for TMG Consulting.
He has 14 years experience in the energy industry, providing IT
management services to energy retailers, energy producers and RTO
organizations. For more information on TMG Consulting visit www.tmgconsulting.com

UtiliPoint's Emerging Technologies IssueAlert articles are
compiled based on the independent analysis of UtiliPoint consultants,
researchers, and analysts. The opinions expressed in UtiliPoint's
Emerging Technologies IssueAlert articles are not intended to predict
financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis
for investment decisions of any kind. UtiliPoint's sole purpose
in publishing its Emerging Technologies IssueAlert articles is to
Offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring
in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as
an expert on energy issues.
©2004, UtiliPoint International, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual
property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed,
redisseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast,
directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written
permission of UtiliPoint, Inc.
|
|