|

IssueAlert Emerging Technologies ~ November,
2003
Fear
Factor - CIS
By Gary Weseloh, Vice
President & Senior Consultant, TMG Consulting, Inc.
I remember watching the show “Fear Factor” once and
thinking out loud that the contestants must be crazy to be doing
what they were, but my wife corrected me saying that they were just
trying to live life to the fullest.
Is there a correlation here between those contestants and all of
us when we are considering a new Customer Information System (CIS)?
Are we content to only considering the established CIS solutions,
or are we willing to subject ourselves to a slightly greater risk
and possibly reap the greater rewards. Are you and your company
open to considering something outside of the norm with the potential
to really “bring home the money”? Is fear a factor for
you?
When TMG Consulting is assisting a utility in preparing the RFP
for a new CIS, the discussion eventually comes around to the minimum
requirements. This set of requirements is arrived at following an
extensive needs assessment which includes business practices, functionality
requirements, technology strategy, environmental and market drivers,
and other considerations. The minimum requirements should be just
that—the absolute minimums that a CIS product solution and
its implementers must have to be considered for the utility. This
process, and the communication of these minimums, is valuable both
for the utility, in that it sets the basis for the entire evaluation
team, and for the vendor community, as it saves vendors who may
not meet the stated minimums from the time-consuming and costly
process of preparing their response. However, even though this is
meant to be a limiting factor, it many times proves to be very frustrating
to us that some of the emerging CIS solutions, or those that are
established in other areas of the world but not yet in North America,
are never given proper consideration. Instead, only the North American
market leaders are considered over and over again.
Don't get me wrong. I am not advocating that you ignore the North
American market leaders, as they are likely market leaders for very
good reasons, but I am suggesting that you also consider stepping
outside your comfort zone as you may be surprised at what you find.
You may discover that your fear of what you perceive to be unknown
or unproven solutions may not be justified, and they can provide
numerous benefits to you and your company.
What is an emerging or less established system?
First of all, I need to define what I mean by an emerging
or less established system. I don't mean a brand new offering from
a brand new vendor. While I am not necessarily discounting these,
the emerging systems that you may want to consider are those that
are established, proven systems, but not necessarily established
in North America. These are solutions where the product vendor and/or
its implementation partner have an established track record. They
have referenceable clients. Their financial stability can be validated.
However, they have not yet been able to establish a foothold, or
a substantial enough of a foothold in North America. Therefore,
it is much more difficult for a utility evaluation team to see the
system in production and have extensive discussions with the vendor's
clients.
One of the first things we have to get past is what appears at
times to be our very conceited opinion that if the vendor is not
from this continent, and the product was not developed and supported
on this continent, it won't work here. The automobile industry has
proven that to be invalid. While I still love my American-made cars,
I have to acknowledge that many of the foreign-made ones have features—and
cost—that many times outweigh the comfort I have with American-made.
And look at the electronics industry. American firms have a very
hard time competing with the foreign corporations and their products.
There are a few foreign-made CIS solutions which are established
here, with offices, support staff and CIS clients. There are other
CIS solutions out there that have set up offices and have staff
here, and that are now attempting to establish themselves through
client sites in North America.
Are you an “Early Adopter”—someone who likes
challenges and the rewards they produce? Or, are you and your company's
culture more attuned to being followers? Many times I hear utility
personnel say that they want to be “leading edge, not bleeding
edge”. I support that concept and contend here that considering
an emerging CIS solution will not necessarily put you into that
bleeding edge category.
Why should you consider these solutions?
Price. One of the first reasons is price. Many
foreign automobile makers got us interested in their products
and into their showrooms first of all based on price. They either
discounted their products substantially, or their costs to produce
their products were substantially less than American-made cars.
Many times you will find the same situation with emerging CIS
solution vendors. They may be willing to discount their systems,
practically giving away the system, just to get referenceable
sites in North America. Or, they may offer to partner with you,
and develop your customizations or modifications at no cost to
you. They may be willing to assume the bulk of the financial risk
to ensure that you are successful with their solution.
Ongoing service fees may be substantially lower for these solutions
as well. Annual maintenance prices are usually a percentage of
the license cost. Therefore, the combined savings can be substantial
over the life of the product. If you can get a fully-functional
system, customized for you, at a substantially lower price, is
that worth considering?
Features. We like the way we do business here
in North America and many of us are very reluctant to change.
But, we are only a small piece of the world's utility market and
we need to keep in mind that there may be better ways of doing
things. Utilities in other parts of the world may have had other
priorities and may have already been affected by other drivers
than we have been. One obvious example is competition. There are
CIS solutions in production which have addressed these requirements
and may have features in their systems which have been in operation
for several years already.
Successful Projects. When vendors are being
considered, we need to ascertain how successful they have been
with their previous implementations. This is a pertinent point
that is often by-passed or skirted around. The question is “how
many successes has the vendor experienced and how many failures,
or how many of their projects have been stopped?” It should
not be based on whether it was an implementation within North
America. Successful installation and failures is the question.
Where it may have been installed should be secondary. Utilities
around the world are no less concerned about the quality, functionality
and implementation of CIS solutions than any North American utility
might be.
The question of “how many projects have been completed
on time and within budget”, should also be asked. This is
a risk factor that should be thoroughly investigated. It may not
seem related to doing business with a foreign-based provider;
however, you may find that it may be less risky to do business
with a foreign-based provider than it is to do business with a
domestic based provider when it comes to project management and
overruns.
Quality Product and Implementation Satisfaction. Many
times there is an opportunity to establish a real partnership
with one of these vendors. If you are willing to be an Early Adopter,
you will be a very significant client for that vendor. They must
satisfy you if they hope to make additional sales. You could be
their primary reference on this continent. We have all seen how
companies across all industries tend to treat their largest customers
better than they do their smaller ones. Think about how well you
would probably be treated if you were a vendor's only customer
in North America, or one of just a few customers. In addition
to outstanding customer service and support, your utility would
really be in the driver's seat when it comes to influencing the
design of new product features.
Technology. I have been told many times by vendors
how difficult it is to move into North America. The vendors who
are attempting this feat are doing so because they feel that their
solution provides a clear advantage or alternative to those that
are already here. Many times that advantage is the technology.
Many of these systems have been developed fairly recently from
the ground up using the latest development technology. Some of
these solutions were developed for today's market—to meet
the changing needs of this evolving industry. This is one advantage
from which old solutions can never benefit, with their aging architecture
and development platforms. New CIS solutions have a much longer
life ahead of them than their older, mostly outdated counterparts.
New technology is designed to meet the challenges of new problems—if
the old technology worked, there would be no need for new technology!
Timing. If time is a consideration for you and
you foresee major work associated with modifications or interfaces,
consider the fact that many of these emerging companies have development
centers throughout the world. Development issues can be "handed
off" from the North American development center to offshore
development centers where work can continue literally "around
the clock". This is a real advantage when the issues may
be time critical in nature.
Likewise, if disaster recovery is a concern these providers can
help in the development of a disaster recovery plan that would
include a backup in an offshore location.
Financial Stability. Every utility must make
sure that the CIS vendor it selects is a financially stable company,
whether North American or foreign. This should be thoroughly investigated.
In the end, utilities may find that there are indeed stable foreign-based
providers, and in better financial condition than their North
American counterparts. Some of these foreign-based CIS providers
are companies backed by huge, financially stable utilities doing
business in other countries. Thus, if risk is a concern, these
may be the CIS vendors that have the financial backing to mitigate
that risk. They may have a long history of successful operations.
What is the Bottom Line?
“It is time for a new generation of leadership, to cope
with new problems and new opportunities”—John F. Kennedy,
July 4, 1960.
Although this was first said over 40 years ago, it is still true
today and is applicable in every industry from software development
to car manufacturing. So why are CIS purchasers so reluctant to
buy “new” technology solutions? It is surprising when
you consider all the possible advantages of buying a CIS from an
emerging vendor.
There is no logical reason why utilities should not receive the
best-of-class from the world-wide pool of solutions rather than
limiting themselves to the best solution in their local marketplace.
The bottom line is that CIS solutions from these emerging vendors
may be better able to meet the new challenges experienced by this
evolving industry. They may have the most attractive prices and
terms, proven implementation strategies, and successful clients.
These companies may try harder to win your business and keep you
happier than ever before.
Are the rewards worth it? Is fear a factor for you?
Gary Weseloh is a Vice President and Senior Consultant
with TMG Consulting. He has over 30 years of utility experience,
including the management of customer systems (CIS, meter reading,
remittance processing, complex billing) at a large combination utility,
consulting on mobile computing/field work automation, and extensive
selection, evaluation and installation oversight projects with TMG
Consulting. He can be reached at garyw@tmgconsulting.com.
Soluziona (dbeasey@us.soluziona.com),
Prophecy Americas (peta.cowan@prophecy-open.com.au),
and Hansen North America (William.Roetzheim@HansenUSA.com)
are among the new/emerging CIS vendors who contributed input and suggestions
for this article.
UtiliPoint's Emerging Technologies IssueAlert articles are
compiled based on the independent analysis of UtiliPoint consultants,
researchers, and analysts. The opinions expressed in UtiliPoint's
Emerging Technologies IssueAlert articles are not intended to predict
financial performance of companies discussed, or to be the basis
for investment decisions of any kind. UtiliPoint's sole purpose
in publishing its Emerging Technologies IssueAlert articles is to
offer an independent perspective regarding the key events occurring
in the energy industry, based on its long-standing reputation as
an expert on energy issues.
©2003, UtiliPoint International, Inc. All rights reserved.
This article is protected by United States copyright and other intellectual
property laws and may not be reproduced, rewritten, distributed,
redisseminated, transmitted, displayed, published or broadcast,
directly or indirectly, in any medium without the prior written
permission of UtiliPoint, Inc.
|